Critical Review by:

Peter Bryant, Senior Principal Electrical Engineer

 

"I got your book in the mail on Saturday and I finished it up at lunch today (Tuesday).  This is a very good and well-written book.  I have never seriously considered the preterist view viable until now.  I have pretty much been an amillenialist, with many caveats.  I still have some issues, but you make a very good case, and I’m leaning heavily toward your general interpretive method.

I have struggled with a futurist mentality AND an understanding of modern science’s findings for some time.  I had begun to move toward some of the points you bring out fairly clearly in your book.  For example, I agree that militant atheism and militant fundamentalism are two peas in a pod.  Their dependency on each other, as well as their similarities of intellectual methods, became obvious to me as I studied them.  They will self-destruct (or mutually annihilate each other).  I had also come to the conclusion that American Christianity’s denial of science would destroy its witness.  I loved your section on the multiple witness argument!  Great stuff.  May I use it in Sunday School?

...Once again, thanks for the good read and the very interesting way of looking at this problem.  I came away with much more than I took in.  Well worth the price of admission!"