Critical Review by:
Peter Bryant, Senior Principal Electrical Engineer
back to Critical Review
"I got your book in the mail on Saturday and I finished it up at
lunch today (Tuesday).† This is a very good and well-written book.† I
have never seriously considered the preterist view viable until now.† I
have pretty much been an amillenialist, with many caveats.† I still have
some issues, but you make a very good case, and Iím leaning heavily
toward your general interpretive method.
I have struggled with a futurist mentality AND an understanding
of modern scienceís findings for some time.† I had begun to move
toward some of the points you bring out fairly clearly in your book.† For
example, I agree that militant atheism and militant fundamentalism are two peas
in a pod.† Their dependency on each other, as well as their similarities
of intellectual methods, became obvious to me as I studied them.† They
will self-destruct (or mutually annihilate each other).† I had also come
to the conclusion that American Christianityís denial of science would
destroy its witness.† I loved your section on the multiple witness
argument!† Great stuff.† May I use it in Sunday School?
...Once again, thanks for the
good read and the very interesting way of looking at this problem.† I came
away with much more than I took in.† Well worth the price of admission!"